Where Is Business Voip Headed Technology And Applications
Posted in category: Technology at: July 27, 2010 by adminWhere Is Business VoIP Headed Technology And Applications
Just where is the business community headed for VoIP technology and applications?Visit here http://vonagevoipcalls.blogspot.com
The answer is not that simple as it can vary greatly by region of the world. The difference in scale and application between small business networks and enterprise VoIP for larger organizations is also a factor in the equation.
What seems to be the practice in the US is that businesses adopt VOIP because it is budget friendly. Most companies deploy VOIP in new offices because it is cheaper than a new digital phone system. Existing offices are migrated to VOIP as leases on digital equipment expired. Interoffice voice communication occurrs without long distance costs as VOIP traffic travels the corporate WAN (VPN/MPLS/etc.) alongside or parallel to data traffic. I see this trend continuing domestically until digital phone systems are phased out completely.
The next challenge is replacing small business (analog) phone systems because they generally keep pace with consumer technology instead of larger businesses. You currently see VOIP for small business and personal use independent of the ISP. A combined offering of Internet data and voice could easily induce universal acceptance of VOIP in even the smallest business (as well as households).
The only thing left behind is conference equipment in businesses of all sizes. Your desktop phone provider rarely provides your digital/analog tripod conference phone and associated equipment. I expect technology advances for VOIP to be in the conference room as opposed to the desktop. When I hear convergence, I think of the unification of voice and data. The conference room is where you can really take advantage of this union.
Today in India especially; many small, medium & large enterprises are looking forward to VoIP technology as companies become more conscious about spending money on PSTN. With recent changes taking place in VoIP technology, and as it becomes more and more affordable, most organisations are coming forward to adapt these newer technologies to fulfill there communication requirements. To tap the growing requirements and market potential, not only the small phone companies but even the PBX manufacturing giants like Nortel, Avaya, Alcatel and Panasonic are continuously working on providing more advanced features and facilities utilizing the maximum possible technical advancements of VoIP. The current trend of unified communication concept is an example for this.
Australia/New Zealand were early adopters of IP telephony particularly in large enterprise and Government sites. The most likely reason to deploy IP Telephony was office relocation, and large enterprise customers replacing their aging legacy PBX with IP Telephony on the basis of future proofing, Toll-Bypass, and lower maintence cost compared to legacy pbx.
Cisco has sold something like over 5 million IP Phones worldwide. Australia & New Zealand combined sold over 500,000 IP Phones.
VoIP Technology is no longer about making cheaper calls in Australia/New Zealand. Its about optimizing business processes with fully integrated communication options. IM, Video Conferencing, Presence, Unified Messaging, and Mobility. I anticpate Australia and New Zealand to be early adopters to Unified Communication in Asia Pac.
Malaysia is an interesting place because, despite the lack of large “enterprise” sale of IP Telephony compared to Australia, there appears to be a large acceptance of VoIP Technology from open source such as SIPX, Asterisk and OpenSER. In fact, a lot of VoIP innovation coming from Malaysia is based on Open Source (ie. Free to download but you have to put long man hours to get it working). A fascinating application is one where you use your 3G mobile phone’s camera to capture a video stream that sends automatically to your blogsite. This application is used also in Insurance companies where members are encouraged to record the “car accident” video clip as part of the process in submitting a claim. Also, the same VoIP technology is used in legal proceedings, in court, where lawyers can access the judge via 3G Mobile phone and IP Video Phone. These applications all use VoIP technology as the foundation.
On another note….the convenience of using the same cable infrastructure, manageability, cost involved maintaining Public Switching Telephone Lines, and quick and easy deployment are just a few parameters which attract most companies to buy the voice communication systems which support VoIP. That’s a cottage industry in itself which will only grow as acceptance and deployment of VoIP takes a firmer hold in the business world.
For example, several Soft PBX softwares can be found on the Internet which are freely available for download and usage. This develpoment implies that the requirement for Hardware PBX is decreasing day by day. This also is an early indication that most of the voice communication techniques and products emerging in the future will be based on VoIP……and software aspects.
Lots of improvements are still needed in VoIP no matter where you are in the world…..but they are in the pipeline. For example, SMEs require simple to setup aid rather then technically rich products. An example of an improvement here would be products like the iSpeedBump from Interworking Labs. This goes outside your firewall and looks at your traffic. If it sees VoIP, it prioritizes that traffic over things that can go slower like e-mail. The device has four main settings to match 99% of cases and you just plug it in, set the switch and go. No more. Cleans up garbled VoIP yielding a better quality voice exchange.
Personally I think VoIP still has a long way to go to really compete with the landlines for business customers….particularly for small businesses. Not so much for large enterprises. For most VOIP installations, especially in a small company, though it is significantly cheaper VoIP doesn’t work anywhere near as well as a landline. Nor are all the security concerns alleviated. At least yet.Visit here http://vonagevoipcalls.blogspot.com
Oh, come on, it's just GOTTA be the transporter.
Technology is not bad.
It's how we use it and whether we consider all the consequences before we put it in place. We have not done that in the past. We can't do things that way anymore.
Technology is what we will use to solve the problems that our misuse of it has brought about.
At the same time, we have to realize that sometimes simple technology is the answer. For example, here's a company doing something to save fuel for ocean freighters. It is really low tech, and it works.
http://www.skysails.info/index.php?id=20&L=1
and an American company doing the same thing.
http://www.kiteship.com/
These are parasails for ships. The cost of retrofitting a ship is dirt cheap. About the cost of leasing a large cape size bulk carrier ship for 2 days.
http://www.pluginpartners.org/
Plug in Partners is an advocacy group for plug in hybrid cars. This is what we need now. The average American driver would get 100mpg overall, and could charge the battery overnight, during off peak electricity demand, for $1.
That would get the average commuter back and forth to work, using no gasoline. You would only use gasoline on longer trips.
Here's a new book that demonstrates what we can do to save our planet while benefitting economically from the positive changes.
http://www.earththesequel.com./
"Krupp and Horn have turned the doom and gloom of global warming on its head. Earth: The Sequel makes it crystal clear that we can build a low-carbon economy while unleashing American entrepreneurs to save the planet, putting optimism back into the environmental story."
Michael Bloomberg, Mayor of New York City
Green Wombat is a good site to follow advances being made in alternative energy and electric and PHEV cars etc.
http://blogs.business2.com/greenwombat/
article on creative financing for solar, including what Berkeley is doing
http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/solar-temblor-9-big-trends-page10.html
It takes the sting out of the up front cost of installing solar. This is also happening on a corporate level, with companies like Morgan Stanley setting up financing and power purchase agreements for corporations and other large businesses to install solar panels.
Power purchase agreements are how power companies in California, Nevada and Arizona are contracting for solar thermal power plants in the southwest. These PPAs are a very positive move in the right direction.
Here's what's happening on the cutting edge of thin film solar cells and panels
"Nanosolar’s founder and chief executive, Martin Roscheisen, claims to be the first solar panel manufacturer to be able to profitably sell solar panels for less than $1 a watt. That is the price at which solar energy becomes less expensive than coal."
“With a $1-per-watt panel,” he said, “it is possible to build $2-per-watt systems.”
"According to the Energy Department, building a new coal plant costs about $2.1 a watt, plus the cost of fuel and emissions, he said."
from http://www.grinzo.com/energy/index.php/category/solar/
This article shows how we could have a 69% solar electric grid by 2050, building solar power plants in the southwest.
Scientific American A Solar Grand Plan
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=a-solar-grand-plan
I don't agree with all the specifics of this proposal, but it is generally a good idea, even if we only do half or a third of what they are recommending.
It's becoming apparent that solar thermal plants are a better idea than the concentrating solar photovoltaic plants that they are emphasizing. And molten salt for storing thermal energy to generate electricity at night from solar plants is looking like the better idea. They propose caverns filled with compressed air. Molten salt only loses about 1% of it's heat over a 24 hour period, and doesn't involve digging all those caverns.
"The same acre can produce 10 times as much energy from wind as it can from corn ethanol, 180,000 miles per acre per year. But both corn ethanol and wind power pale in comparison with solar photovoltaic, which can produce more than 2 million miles worth of transport per acre per year." http://www.ecogeek.org/content/view/1454/70/
"Solar thermal power plants such as Ausra's generate electricity by driving steam turbines with sunshine. Ausra's solar concentrators boil water with focused sunlight, and produce electricity at prices directly competitive with gas- and coal-fired electric power."
"Solar thermal power plants can store energy during daylight hours and generate power when it's needed. Ausra's power plants collect the sun's energy as heat; Ausra is developing thermal energy storage systems which can store enough heat to run the power plant for up to 20 hours during dark or cloudy periods."
" All of America's needs for electric power – the entire US grid, night and day – can be generated with Ausra's current technology using a square parcel of land 92 miles on a side. For comparison, this is less than 1% of America's deserts, less land than currently in use in the U.S. for coal mines."
"In recent months, PG&E has signed deals for more than a gigawatt of electricity — enough to light more than 750,000 homes — with solar power plant developers. Such power purchase agreements can take more than a year to hammer out and the permitting and construction of a solar power station can take another three to five years."
"The solar thermal industry is in its infancy but utilities like PG&E (PCG), Southern California Edison (EIX) and San Diego Gas & Electric (SRE) have signed several contracts for solar power plants and negotiations for gigawatts more of solar electricity are ongoing."
from Green Wombat
Biomass to methane power also has big potential.
Sewage treatment plants, landfills, farms etc can all use anaerobic digesters to gather methane for power. This methane would eventually develop as things decompose and become greenhouse gas adding to global warming. This kills two birds with one stone. Check out what Environmental Power Corp is doing in this area.
Wind power
"In the US, the American Wind Energy Association forecasts that installed capacity could grow from 11,603 MW today to around 100,000 MW by 2020. In Canada, Emerging Energy Research predicts that installed wind capacity will expand from around 1,500 MW today to around 14,000 MW by 2015."
{from an article at altenergystocks.com by Charles Morand}
We now have a fledgling bioplastics industry which can make plastics from plant material like corn or non food plants like switchgrass. We now use 5-10% of our oil to make plastics, which create huge environmental problems, especially in the oceans.
Most plastic floats near the sea surface where some is mistaken for food by birds and fishes. Plastics are carried by currents and can circulate continually in the open sea. Broken, degraded plastic pieces outweigh surface zooplankton in the central North Pacific by a factor of 6-1. That means six pounds of plastic for every single pound of zooplankton."
DR. Marcus Ericson
http://www.algalita.org/research.html#plastic
http://www.algalita.org/pelagic_plastic.html
"I'd put my money on the sun & solar energy. What a source of power! I hope we don't have to wait until oil and coal run out before we tackle that." Thomas Edison, 1931
Oh, there was that bit in the bible where Jesus turned dihydrogen monoxide into ethyl alcohol… or the part where he walked on surface tension… oh wait… its just a story…………….. P.S. please learn how to use grammar correctly.